<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PulseAudio Foray</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188</link>
	<description>{{{ ZX2C4 }}}</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:21:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: loopmob</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>loopmob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-851</guid>
		<description>you just got yourself a place in my bookmarks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you just got yourself a place in my bookmarks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mac Laptop News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News: &#8220;Jason A. Donenfeld (zx2c4/jdonenfeld): PulseAudio Foray&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Mac Laptop News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News: &#8220;Jason A. Donenfeld (zx2c4/jdonenfeld): PulseAudio Foray&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-833</guid>
		<description>[...] Jason A. Donenfeld (zx2c4/jdonenfeld): PulseAudio Foray on Planet KDETopics: MacBook [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jason A. Donenfeld (zx2c4/jdonenfeld): PulseAudio Foray on Planet KDETopics: MacBook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LBL</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>LBL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-464</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using PA too. It makes it easy for me to listen to my music via bluetooth on my hifi... Great thing. And really easy to configure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using PA too. It makes it easy for me to listen to my music via bluetooth on my hifi&#8230; Great thing. And really easy to configure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDS</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>KDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-461</guid>
		<description>&quot;Since when do I need to configure sound??? It worked out of the box for years on several distros.&quot;

@Arnomane

Yes, you shouldn&#039;t, but I mean if the user compiles PA and installs it, then he has to do the right configuration or use the default which is ok. Or if the user download PA through the package manager of the distro, then the distro has to config PA correctly. It is like enabling DMix by default, it was a distro choose. 

&quot;1) NO per application volume control per default. All apps that do audio playback should control ONE global PCM control (the one you can find in your mixer applet as well).&quot;

Why not? It is a great idea, with that you could decrees the volume of music or a video if a call comes.
The other two points is PA willing to resolve. 
They (PA team) are not fixing a no existent bug or reinventing the wheel. It is true it has worked ok for many people, but it can work better, and with PA this can be true. We need better sound tools, like a modern OS, take a look at Mac OS X or Win vista, they have better sound tools than Alsa can offer wight now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Since when do I need to configure sound??? It worked out of the box for years on several distros.&#8221;</p>
<p>@Arnomane</p>
<p>Yes, you shouldn&#8217;t, but I mean if the user compiles PA and installs it, then he has to do the right configuration or use the default which is ok. Or if the user download PA through the package manager of the distro, then the distro has to config PA correctly. It is like enabling DMix by default, it was a distro choose. </p>
<p>&#8220;1) NO per application volume control per default. All apps that do audio playback should control ONE global PCM control (the one you can find in your mixer applet as well).&#8221;</p>
<p>Why not? It is a great idea, with that you could decrees the volume of music or a video if a call comes.<br />
The other two points is PA willing to resolve.<br />
They (PA team) are not fixing a no existent bug or reinventing the wheel. It is true it has worked ok for many people, but it can work better, and with PA this can be true. We need better sound tools, like a modern OS, take a look at Mac OS X or Win vista, they have better sound tools than Alsa can offer wight now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gen2ly</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Gen2ly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-424</guid>
		<description>...but phonon-gstreamer is just too buggy,...

I remember not too far back they were considering dropping gstreamer support from phonon but since I think this has been worked on quite a bit.  On my arch install phonon-gstreamer is the default and haven&#039;t come across any problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but phonon-gstreamer is just too buggy,&#8230;</p>
<p>I remember not too far back they were considering dropping gstreamer support from phonon but since I think this has been worked on quite a bit.  On my arch install phonon-gstreamer is the default and haven&#8217;t come across any problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliasp</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>eliasp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-423</guid>
		<description>I depend on PA too, as I haven&#039;t found another non-hackish solution for this setup yet:

- I have a 5.1 speaker set
- The 5.1 speaker set is fed through an USB soundcard
- The USB soundcard is attached to my fileserver
- I want to be able to play sound on my 5.1 set from every computer in my network

So I need a solid solution which is able to route the complete sound stream from every client to the fileserver.
PulseAudio was the only one which provided me so far something which worked at least basically (not to mention the stuttering sound via wireless connections, strangely disappearing connections to the soundserver, missing control from KDE applications, PA related bugs when playing music via Amarok, ....).

IMHO PA could really need a little more love in KDE/Phonon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I depend on PA too, as I haven&#8217;t found another non-hackish solution for this setup yet:</p>
<p>- I have a 5.1 speaker set<br />
- The 5.1 speaker set is fed through an USB soundcard<br />
- The USB soundcard is attached to my fileserver<br />
- I want to be able to play sound on my 5.1 set from every computer in my network</p>
<p>So I need a solid solution which is able to route the complete sound stream from every client to the fileserver.<br />
PulseAudio was the only one which provided me so far something which worked at least basically (not to mention the stuttering sound via wireless connections, strangely disappearing connections to the soundserver, missing control from KDE applications, PA related bugs when playing music via Amarok, &#8230;.).</p>
<p>IMHO PA could really need a little more love in KDE/Phonon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnomane</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnomane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Erm. Since when do I need to configure sound??? It worked out of the box for years on several distros. When I bought my Samsung NC10 I had to install the (at that time) new OpenSuse 11.1 because it was the only one with working ACPI on it (now it works with other distros, too).

Anyways I simply didn&#039;t feel like bothering with PulseAudio&#039;s nasty extra volume settings  and horrible playback delays. I just wiped of any piece of PulseAudio and afterwards applications using libxine/ALSA just worked like a charm as on my other computers (ok I installed Packman&#039;s libxine in order to have the proprietary codecs...).

As you are refering &quot;nice sound&quot;.

&quot;Nice sound&quot; would be:
1) NO per application volume control per default. All apps that do audio playback should control ONE global PCM control (the one you can find in your mixer applet as well).
2) A nice mixer applet that shows to the people which volume controls are combined with a logical AND.
3) Never create a situation where more than two volume controls are combined until the sound comes out of the speaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm. Since when do I need to configure sound??? It worked out of the box for years on several distros. When I bought my Samsung NC10 I had to install the (at that time) new OpenSuse 11.1 because it was the only one with working ACPI on it (now it works with other distros, too).</p>
<p>Anyways I simply didn&#8217;t feel like bothering with PulseAudio&#8217;s nasty extra volume settings  and horrible playback delays. I just wiped of any piece of PulseAudio and afterwards applications using libxine/ALSA just worked like a charm as on my other computers (ok I installed Packman&#8217;s libxine in order to have the proprietary codecs&#8230;).</p>
<p>As you are refering &#8220;nice sound&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nice sound&#8221; would be:<br />
1) NO per application volume control per default. All apps that do audio playback should control ONE global PCM control (the one you can find in your mixer applet as well).<br />
2) A nice mixer applet that shows to the people which volume controls are combined with a logical AND.<br />
3) Never create a situation where more than two volume controls are combined until the sound comes out of the speaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Monroe</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-421</guid>
		<description>PA &amp; KDE probably work for simple use cases (making beep noises). But phonon-gstreamer is just too buggy, and xine+pulseaudio isn&#039;t pretty.

So really the most important thing anyone could do is make phonon-gst suck less. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PA &amp; KDE probably work for simple use cases (making beep noises). But phonon-gstreamer is just too buggy, and xine+pulseaudio isn&#8217;t pretty.</p>
<p>So really the most important thing anyone could do is make phonon-gst suck less. <img src='http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: illissius</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>illissius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-420</guid>
		<description>While PulseAudio seems like a mess in many ways (let&#039;s provide a transparent audio experience by requiring every single application and library to be updated to use PulseAudio! excellent plan), how else do you achieve the things PA does, like a single UI for per-application volume setting across the entire system? So maybe it&#039;s a necessary evil. I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While PulseAudio seems like a mess in many ways (let&#8217;s provide a transparent audio experience by requiring every single application and library to be updated to use PulseAudio! excellent plan), how else do you achieve the things PA does, like a single UI for per-application volume setting across the entire system? So maybe it&#8217;s a necessary evil. I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDS</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>KDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Ah, and the idea that PA harms and breaks the working sound... it is fault of the distribution or the user who installed and didn&#039;t configured it. 

You could try Fedora or Mandriva (I think openSUSE also), PA works very nice with those distros, and now seems that Ubuntu has a working PA configuration.

The in GNOME based distros the have now very nice sound tools, at the level of Mac OS X.  We need that in KDE!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, and the idea that PA harms and breaks the working sound&#8230; it is fault of the distribution or the user who installed and didn&#8217;t configured it. </p>
<p>You could try Fedora or Mandriva (I think openSUSE also), PA works very nice with those distros, and now seems that Ubuntu has a working PA configuration.</p>
<p>The in GNOME based distros the have now very nice sound tools, at the level of Mac OS X.  We need that in KDE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-418</guid>
		<description>There was a Summer of Code project for a KDE PulseAudio mixer with Pardus (a KDE focused Linux distro) as mentor: http://socghop.appspot.com/student_project/show/google/gsoc2009/pardus/t124023187475

http://developer.pardus.org.tr/people/tekman/blog/?p=115

Except the one Pardus student who developed finger print login support for KDM, no one of the other blogged or were not aggregated at Planet KDE. So I have absolutely no idea what happened to the PA mixer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a Summer of Code project for a KDE PulseAudio mixer with Pardus (a KDE focused Linux distro) as mentor: <a href="http://socghop.appspot.com/student_project/show/google/gsoc2009/pardus/t124023187475" rel="nofollow">http://socghop.appspot.com/student_project/show/google/gsoc2009/pardus/t124023187475</a></p>
<p><a href="http://developer.pardus.org.tr/people/tekman/blog/?p=115" rel="nofollow">http://developer.pardus.org.tr/people/tekman/blog/?p=115</a></p>
<p>Except the one Pardus student who developed finger print login support for KDM, no one of the other blogged or were not aggregated at Planet KDE. So I have absolutely no idea what happened to the PA mixer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDS</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>KDS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-417</guid>
		<description>I have PA 0.9.15 installed in KDE 4.3 with 0 problems.

For KDE apps I only configured Phonon to use PA.
For GNOME apps, with configuring gstreamer and/or ESD it works.
For the rest of the apps this http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/PerfectSetup should work

Everything works, and it is ease to configure the 5.1 surround speakers.

What KDE needs is GUIs for PA, like the GTK+ ones, could be plasma widgets or something in KMix. Until then I have to use the GTK+ apps like pavucontrol or pavumeter.

PA has some great features, like per-application volume control and better sound quality than the Alsa mixer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio#Features

For the one interested, there is a brainstorm idea to integrate PA with KDE, which would benefit all distros and users. http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20083/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have PA 0.9.15 installed in KDE 4.3 with 0 problems.</p>
<p>For KDE apps I only configured Phonon to use PA.<br />
For GNOME apps, with configuring gstreamer and/or ESD it works.<br />
For the rest of the apps this <a href="http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/PerfectSetup" rel="nofollow">http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/PerfectSetup</a> should work</p>
<p>Everything works, and it is ease to configure the 5.1 surround speakers.</p>
<p>What KDE needs is GUIs for PA, like the GTK+ ones, could be plasma widgets or something in KMix. Until then I have to use the GTK+ apps like pavucontrol or pavumeter.</p>
<p>PA has some great features, like per-application volume control and better sound quality than the Alsa mixer.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio#Features" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio#Features</a></p>
<p>For the one interested, there is a brainstorm idea to integrate PA with KDE, which would benefit all distros and users. <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20083/" rel="nofollow">http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20083/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-416</guid>
		<description>If you want real good platform independence you might you OSS4 for that.its open source, works on various platforms. and provides good mixing. And Phonon on top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want real good platform independence you might you OSS4 for that.its open source, works on various platforms. and provides good mixing. And Phonon on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnomane</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnomane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Well whatfor do I need PulseAudio (user, programmer, ...) ?

Audio hardware is greatly supported by ALSA (including basic sound mixing) and there are several good audio/video codec frameworks. If you want some platform independence within your application (e.g. on plattforms that don&#039;t have ALSA and/or another codec framework) you can either use something like Phonon or hope that Gstreamer exists for every plattform you want.

If you want to do advanced sound mixing  and editing etc. you will quickly come to Jack. You certainly don&#039;t want to use PulseAudio for that.

If you want to have network transparent sound you should use an appropriate tool for audio  (codec!) streaming (maybe IceCast or VLC) and shouldn&#039;t transmit raw PCM data streams (PCM streams over networks are like VNC compared to NX). Ok if you want a framework for controlling and feeding remote audio devices as well there is NMM (see http://www.networkmultimedia.org ) which existed years before PulseAudio.

Ok the PulseAudio folks just wanted to do their own thing  and wanted to reinvent the wheel again. Ok thats fine, Free Software lives from alternatives  and maybe they have some better ideas (there is a reason that there are so many text editors ;-)  but a sound server who redirects access to my ALSA audio devices and that harms perfectly working competitive audio frameworks running in parallel on that system is an unfriendly uncooperative piece of software that should have never made into serious Linux distributions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well whatfor do I need PulseAudio (user, programmer, &#8230;) ?</p>
<p>Audio hardware is greatly supported by ALSA (including basic sound mixing) and there are several good audio/video codec frameworks. If you want some platform independence within your application (e.g. on plattforms that don&#8217;t have ALSA and/or another codec framework) you can either use something like Phonon or hope that Gstreamer exists for every plattform you want.</p>
<p>If you want to do advanced sound mixing  and editing etc. you will quickly come to Jack. You certainly don&#8217;t want to use PulseAudio for that.</p>
<p>If you want to have network transparent sound you should use an appropriate tool for audio  (codec!) streaming (maybe IceCast or VLC) and shouldn&#8217;t transmit raw PCM data streams (PCM streams over networks are like VNC compared to NX). Ok if you want a framework for controlling and feeding remote audio devices as well there is NMM (see <a href="http://www.networkmultimedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkmultimedia.org</a> ) which existed years before PulseAudio.</p>
<p>Ok the PulseAudio folks just wanted to do their own thing  and wanted to reinvent the wheel again. Ok thats fine, Free Software lives from alternatives  and maybe they have some better ideas (there is a reason that there are so many text editors <img src='http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   but a sound server who redirects access to my ALSA audio devices and that harms perfectly working competitive audio frameworks running in parallel on that system is an unfriendly uncooperative piece of software that should have never made into serious Linux distributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Donenfeld</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Donenfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-414</guid>
		<description>@leo
It has the potential to be great though... if only folks would put a little more love into integrating it. The problem is that KDE devs are against PulseAudio. If they supported it, it would become nicely integrated and the rest of the software world would have more motivation to integrate it. The question you have to ask is how good it potentially could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@leo<br />
It has the potential to be great though&#8230; if only folks would put a little more love into integrating it. The problem is that KDE devs are against PulseAudio. If they supported it, it would become nicely integrated and the rest of the software world would have more motivation to integrate it. The question you have to ask is how good it potentially could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-413</guid>
		<description>and you ask why a lot of KDE users (and developers) are against pulseaudio... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and you ask why a lot of KDE users (and developers) are against pulseaudio&#8230; <img src='http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Donenfeld</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Donenfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-412</guid>
		<description>@Diego
Minutes after posting - awesome thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Diego<br />
Minutes after posting &#8211; awesome thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diego</title>
		<link>http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/188#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasondonenfeld.com/?p=188#comment-411</guid>
		<description>The Skype issue has just been fixed:
http://share.skype.com/sites/linux/2009/08/skype_for_linux_21_beta.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Skype issue has just been fixed:<br />
<a href="http://share.skype.com/sites/linux/2009/08/skype_for_linux_21_beta.html" rel="nofollow">http://share.skype.com/sites/linux/2009/08/skype_for_linux_21_beta.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
